Current biofuels policies are unethical, says Nuffield Council on Bioethics
14 April 2011
Current UK and European policies on biofuels encourage unethical practices, says a report by the Nuffield Council on Bioethics today following an 18-month inquiry. Policies such as the European Renewable Energy Directive are particularly weak when it comes to protecting the environment, reducing greenhouse gas emissions and avoiding human rights violations in developing countries. They also include few incentives for the development of new biofuel technologies that could help avoid these problems.
Biofuels are one of the only renewable alternatives we have for transport fuels such as petrol and diesel, but current policies and targets that encourage their uptake have backfired badly,” said Professor Joyce Tait, who led the inquiry. “The rapid expansion of biofuels production in the developing world has led to problems such as deforestation and the displacement of indigenous people. We want a more sophisticated strategy that considers the wider consequences of biofuel production.”
Growing biofuels should have a certification scheme like Fair Trade for coffee and cocoa.
Researchers are developing new types of biofuels that need less land, produce fewer greenhouse gases and do not compete with food, but commercial-scale production is many years away,” said Professor Ottoline Leyser, one of the authors of the report. “The government should do more to encourage research into these more ethical types of biofuels.”
In its report Biofuels: ethical issues, the Nuffield Council recommends that there should be a set of overarching ethical conditions for all biofuels produced in and imported into Europe, including:
- Biofuels development should not be at the expense of human rights
- Biofuels should be environmentally sustainable
- Biofuels should contribute to a reduction of greenhouse gas emissions
- Biofuels should adhere to fair trade principles
- Costs and benefits of biofuels should be distributed in an equitable way
These ethical conditions should be enforced through a certification scheme – a bit like the Fair Trade scheme for cocoa and coffee,” said Professor Tait. “This would create a market for environmentally sustainable and ‘human rights friendly’ biofuels.”
We appreciate the difficulties in applying firm ethical principles in the real world, but existing biofuels policy is failing. We can set the standard in Europe and encourage the rest of the world to follow suit. This is a global problem that needs a global solution.”
The two main transport biofuels currently in use are bioethanol, made from maize and sugar cane, and biodiesel, made from palm and rape seed oil. The European Renewable Energy Directive states that 10% of transport fuel must come from renewable sources by 2020. In the UK, 5% of transport fuel must come from renewable sources by 2013. To meet these targets, biofuels are being imported from countries that do not all have responsible or enforceable policies on climate change or human rights. The targets also rely on voluntary agreements on environmental sustainability for biofuels produced outside the EU.
Researchers are developing technologies that enable all of the plant to be used in biofuel production, meaning less waste and higher energy outputs. Another avenue of research is using algae to produce biofuels that do not compete for agricultural land, but this is mostly at the experimental stage.
There is a duty to develop biofuels that comply with our ethical principles,” said Professor Tait. “Governments should incentivise the development of new types of biofuels that need less land and produce fewer greenhouse gases, for example by creating research funding programmes or encouraging public-private partnerships.”
The wider picture
Tackling climate change whilst providing energy and fuel for a growing global population presents us with a formidable challenge,” said Professor Tait. “We have developed these ethical principles with biofuels in mind, but we urge policy makers to use them as a checklist for all new technologies. Biofuels, if produced in an ethical way, have great potential to contribute to the energy mix, but they alone cannot solve our problems.”
Biofuels currently make up 3% of UK road transport fuel and this is expected to increase. Most of the UK’s biofuel comes from Argentina, Brazil and Europe. Last year, only a third met the environmental standards set by the UK’s Renewable Transport Fuel Obligation.1
Recent amendments to European policy have attempted to raise the social and environmental standards of biofuels, but these are not widely enforced outside Europe. A promising global initiative is the Roundtable on Sustainable Biofuels. This independent organisation has set out voluntary standards for biofuels covering human rights, greenhouse gas emissions, conservation, and use of natural resources across the entire lifecycle of the biofuel.
The standards set out by the Roundtable on Sustainable Biofuels provide a good starting point for the international certification scheme for biofuels we are recommending,” said Professor Tait.
Notes to editors
1. Contact to arrange an interview or for further information
Nuffield Council on Bioethics
28 Bedford Square, London WC1B 3JS
Phone:+44 (0)20 7681 9619
+44 (0)7747 635863
2. The report
The report Biofuels: ethical issues is available to download from the Council’s website
3. Policy Forum article in Science magazine
Reflections on the key findings of the report will be featured in a Policy Forum article in Science magazine this week. The article, authored by Professor Joyce Tait and Dr Alena Buyx (Assistant Director of the Nuffield Council on Bioethics), will be published to coincide with the launch of the report.
The Nuffield Council on Bioethics established a Working Party in 2009 to examine the ethical issues raised by biofuels. The Working Party, chaired by Professor Joyce Tait, included members with expertise in science, the environment, ethics, law, policy, economics, the commercial sector, energy security, and sustainable and international development. To inform its deliberations, the Working Party:
held a public consultation from December 2009 to March 2010, during which 90 contributions were received from a wide range of organisations and individuals.
held a series of fact-finding meetings with, for example, non-governmental organisations, scientists and industry.
Full details of the method of working and a summary of the consultation responses can be found in the report.
5. Working Party members
6. About the Nuffield Council on Bioethics
The Nuffield Council on Bioethics examines ethical issues raised by new developments in biology and medicine. Established by the Nuffield Foundation in 1991, the Council is an independent body, funded jointly by the Foundation, the Medical Research Council and the Wellcome Trust. The Council has achieved an international reputation for addressing public concerns, and providing independent advice to assist policy makers and stimulate debate in bioethics.