Foundation commissions workshops on how AI can improve lives

By Nuffield Foundation

Two prominent research institutions will host a series of workshops exploring the opportunities and risks of using AI in the public sector. 

The Nuffield Foundation, in collaboration with the Ada Lovelace Institute, has commissioned four workshops. They will be led by Professor Diane Coyle at the Bennett Institute for Public Policy and Professor Wendy Hall at the Web Science Institute. The workshops will be at the forefront of generating new research ideas on how to steer the development and use of artificial intelligence (AI) in the public sector for the benefit of people and society. The findings will inform a funding call on AI, a new priority area of interest for the Foundation.

Many urgent questions remain unanswered about the potential far-reaching impact of this technology on people’s lives. AI’s rapid development raises concerns about data privacy and decision-making, which could lead to biases and unequal treatment of citizens. But there are also likely to be positives, such as improving the responsiveness of public services, and better data analysis.   

Crowds on Princes Street in Edinburgh, Scotland

What will the workshops include?

The four workshops will explore the advantages and drawbacks facing the public sector as they start to adopt AI, very often without the capacity or skills to evaluate AI products or use them appropriately and effectively.

Topics include: 

  • Just outcomes: AI and administrative justice  
  • AI and Public Health  
  • Civic AI for place-based solutions 
  • Market failures: what will Silicon Valley not do?  

Creating a unique forum, each workshop will bring together leading stakeholders, experts, and policymakers from a range of sectors and disciplines to discuss the issues within the overarching context of how AI can enable public services to be delivered effectively, equitably, and responsibly.

They will also identify research questions relating to technical challenges, governance, the social and political context, data and information gaps, ethics, and public attitudes. 

The Foundation will use findings from the workshops to set out details of a new funding call on AI. It will be part of our Research, Development and Analysis Fund in March 2025.

Alex Beer, Head of Grants Operations and Portfolio Development, is leading the project.

The Foundation wants the power of AI to be harnessed to build a better future for society. Alex Beer, Head of Grant Operations and Portfolio Development
By Nuffield Foundation

Explore our projects

Justice | 2023 - 2025

Access to justice through artificial intelligence

View project
Code encounters algorithmic risk-profiling in housing: a family in their kitchen at home
In progress

Welfare | 2022 - 2024

Code encounters: algorithmic risk-profiling in housing

View project
Birds-eye view of virtual reality crowd
Reported

Welfare | 2018 - 2019

Overview of the major ethical issues arising from data, algorithms and AI

View project

Justice | 2023 - 2025

Access to justice through artificial intelligence

View project
Code encounters algorithmic risk-profiling in housing: a family in their kitchen at home
In progress

Welfare | 2022 - 2024

Code encounters: algorithmic risk-profiling in housing

View project
Birds-eye view of virtual reality crowd
Reported

Welfare | 2018 - 2019

Overview of the major ethical issues arising from data, algorithms and AI

View project
Code encounters algorithmic risk-profiling in housing: a family in their kitchen at home
In progress

Welfare | 2022 - 2024

Code encounters: algorithmic risk-profiling in housing

View project
Birds-eye view of virtual reality crowd
Reported

Welfare | 2018 - 2019

Overview of the major ethical issues arising from data, algorithms and AI

View project
Search projects

We improve people’s lives by funding research that informs social policy, primarily in Education, Welfare and Justice. We also fund student programmes that give young people skills and confidence in science and research.

We offer our grant-holders the freedom to frame questions and enable new thinking. Our research must stand up to rigorous academic scrutiny, but we understand that to be successful in effecting change, it also needs to be relevant to people’s experience.

Profile